For students working on the Unsolicited Recommendation assignment:
You might find useful information for your topic on a credible web site, if this source type is allowed by your instructor. The boxes on this page list starting points that might be applicable for certain topics.
If you are allowed to use web sites as a source for your paper, make sure to evaluate the credibility and appropriateness of the source. Watch the Evaluating Web Pages video on this page to learn more.
Click the link to view a collection of reports providing analysis and commentary on current and controversial issues in the news.
Evaluating Web Results: A Contextual Approach
A contextual approach uses information found in a variety of sources to evaluate the information found in single source. A contextual approach promotes critical thinking by encouraging the researcher to question a source and make “reasoned judgements of information quality” informed by multiple sources.
Comparison
"Comparison is the examination of the similarities and differences between two or more items. When applied to the evaluation of web sites, comparing means analyzing the similarities and differences in the content of two or more web sites to each other or comparing the content from web sites to other information formats such as newspaper or magazine articles, peer-reviewed journal articles, or scholarly books."
Corroboration
"To corroborate information is to verify it against one or more different sources...Since more information is available and accessible [on the web], this information can be used to verify individual Web sites that may be questionable. The more sources that can be found to corroborate the information, there is a greater probability that the information is reliable.”
Excerpts from:
Meola, M. (2004). Chucking the checklist: A contextual approach to teaching undergraduates web-site evaluation. Libraries and the Academy, 4(3). Retrieved from Project Muse.