Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

English 201: Strategies for Academic Writing

Learning Goals

Welcome to our Course Page for English 201 Strategies for Academic Writing

Session objectives:

  1. Evaluate sources located in Search@UW
  2. Identify a subject specific database for articles
  3. Discuss Scholarly Sources. 

Research Help

If you have questions not answered here, there are several ways to get additional assistance.You can contact the UWM Libraries in a variety of ways, including in person at our Research Help Desk in the Learning Commons:

Image result for online chat image24/7 Online Chat

Image result for phone (414) 229-4659

Image result for email Email Librarian

ask-consult Research Consultation

Customer Service Desk Icon  Research Help Desk (Research Help Desk hours)

The Critical Process

According to The Fundamentals of Literary Criticism, the critical process is comprised of four steps:

Step I: Interpretation

What is this text actually about?

Now is the time to:

  • Look up unfamiliar words.
  • Examine the tone the author uses. The definition of a word may change depending on the context.
  • Consider how language changes when using it in everyday life compared to more technical language.
    • For example, "heart attack" and "myocardial infarction" mean the same thing. A more technical term may be used to describe something with more precision. It also maintains its definition, whereas everyday terms may change meaning over time.

Step II: Orientation

It is easy to become caught up in the author's point of view and reject a text.

Before doing so, consider:

  • What are the author's ideas?
  • What are the ideas of the author's intended audience?
  • What are the circumstances and expectations surrounding the lives of the audience?

Step III: Evaluation

After steps I and II, evaluation of a work often arises naturally. A true evaluation of a work occurs when the reader is certain they see the literary work as it was intended to or should be seen. At this point, the reader forms their judgment of a work, whether it is good or bad and why. This is done without attributing personal tastes to the work.

Step IV: Articulation

At this point, the reader is ready to share their ideas with others. By taking action, the reader opens themselves up to others' critical opinions of works, allowing a dialog to begin.

Roberts, Mark. The Fundamentals of Literary Criticism. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell Limited, 1974. Print.